In both situations there is a lack of resources which causes people to die. This sentence should be read as follows: there's a lack of some resources, and it is this lack that's causing deaths. In effect, without those resources people die; the resources help avoid death. Unfortunately, there's a lack of those resources. This sentence makes sense, and is what you probably want to write.
grammar - When should I use "cause" and "causes"? - English Language ...
Or: Is this the only factor that causes such tragedies? In that form, the singular factor matches with the verb causes. Your sentence mixes the plural rooms with the singular factor, making it hard for you to figure out which form the verb cause (s) should take. (This isn’t necessarily ungrammatical, but sometimes this can make a sentence ...
What causes you concern about the clauses’ having different subjects? Consider I thought she liked ice cream.
means that Tom went toward the light However, "advance" also has a transitive sense, with the general meaning that the subject causes the object to move forward or toward a goal. Joe of course advanced his son's political career means that Joe took actions with the purpose and effect of assisting his son's poltical ambitions.
What causes coral bleaching ? What does cause coral bleaching ? What is the difference?? Which is grammatically correct?
word choice - What causes X or What does cause X? - English Language ...
As your link says, "to cause to be" is a definition of the word "make". As such, the phrase and the word can be fairly interchangeable when used that way. "The jalapenos caused my salsa to be too spicy." "The jalapenos made my salsa too spicy." "Chlorine makes my hair dry." "Chlorine causes my hair to be (or to become) dry." I can't think of a circumstance where "to cause to be" would be ...